If you take part in the public consultation exercise your response will be included in the Consultation Analysis Report (CAR), which is shared with all parties in the application process.
The Consultation Analysis Report (CAR) is a factual statement on how the public consultation was carried out, the questions that were asked and a summary of the responses received. The report also contains the numbers of replies received, the level of support and is jointly produced and agreed by the Health Board (HB) and the applicant.
It is at this point that the applicant will decide either to make a formal application for a new pharmacy or not to move forward with an application. For those that do not move forward, the process is finished.
For those who do move forward to a formal application, the HB’s Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) hears the new pharmacy application and takes into consideration the CAR when making their decision. How they used the CAR in their decision is explained within the record of the PPC meeting.
New Application InformationWhere an applicant decides to move forward to formal application, they must submit their application within 90 days from the end of the public consultation. The application is then checked to make sure it is complete and meets all regulation requirements.
The Health Board (HB) then carries out a further consultation which is required by the pharmacy regulations.
Firstly, a copy of the application is sent to existing pharmacies around the proposed pharmacy, the Health Board’s Area Medical Committee, Area Pharmaceutical Committee, and the local Community Council’s nominated community representative. If the proposed pharmacy is within two kilometres from a neighbouring Health Board boundary, it is also shared with that Board. These parties are invited to comment on the application and all responses received within 30 days are considered by the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC).
The PPC is made up of seven members:
Normally the PPC holds an oral hearing to consider an application. The applicant, other pharmacies, committees and the nominated community representative are invited to attend the hearing, but only if they have made written comments following notification of the application.
The hearing is usually held in a place near to the proposed new pharmacy. Invites are sent out a few weeks in advance and the applicant, other pharmacies, committees and the nominated community representative are able to speak to the PPC and put forward their case.
The, regulations require the PPC to apply what is known as ‘the legal test’ to decide whether granting the application would be “necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises are located by persons whose names are included in the pharmaceutical list”.
Before the PPC can apply this test they must consider a range of issues including (but not restricted to):
The answers to these questions will allow the PPC to decide:
The PPC is an expert panel and uses information heard at the hearing, and provided within their papers to make their decision.
Once the PPC make their decision they make a report for the Health Board that is sent within 10 working days of the hearing. The decision is sent to all those who attended the hearing and is also published on the HB’s public website within five working days of the Board receiving the PPCs report.
The PPC’s decision can be appealed by either the applicant or any other invited hearing attendee within 21 days from the date the decision is sent out by the HB.
The Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC)The Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC)
After this consultation, the application is considered by the PPC which decides if an application is successful or not. The PPC is made up of seven members:
The PPC normally hold an oral hearing to consider the application. The applicant attends this hearing along with anyone consulted during the second consultation exercise and who wrote to the HB about the application.
The PPC applies the statutory test to decide whether granting the application would be “necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises are located by persons whose names are included in the pharmaceutical list”.
In order to apply this test the PPC will give consideration to a range of factors including (but not restricted to):
Consideration of the factors outlined above will allow the PPC to determine:
There are no set criteria to define each factor. It is the role of the PPC as an expert panel to base its decision on the information available to it as well as presented during the hearing.
Once a decision is reached it is notified in accordance with the regulations and the minute of the hearing published on the HB’s public website, which is available on this web page via the links on the left of this page organised by year.
Whilst the decision of the PPC can be appealed the persons who can appeal are limited to the applicant and those parties consulted and who responded during the second consultation exercise.
Your ResponseIf you participate in the public consultation exercise your response will be included in the CAR, which is shared with all parties in the application process.
If you are interested opening a new pharmacy please familiarise yourself with the current regulations and associated documents on this page.
If you want further information on the processes involved please call 0141 201 6047.
The regulations require an applicant to link with the Health Board (HB) as part of pre-application process. The applicant and officers from the HB normally arrange a meeting. The HB officers provide help on regulation and process but they do not and cannot give a view on whether a proposal might be subsequently approved. Existing pharmacies may also need to follow the same process when looking to relocate to different premises.
Before the meeting, the applicant provides details about the proposed pharmacy address, services to be provided and opening hours, which allows discussion on how a new pharmacy in the area might address any unmet needs or improve local patient services.
This discussion is to help the applicant to decide whether to move forward with their proposal. If their decision is to move forward, another meeting is arranged to discuss the Joint Consultation exercise.
The joint public consultation exercise is led by the Health Board (HB) working with the applicant. It invites the views of residents and other interested people and organisations within the area where the proposed premises are located and measures their support for the opening of a new pharmacy at this address.
The exercise must invite views on the following issues:
New pharmacy consultations must be advertised in the newspaper with the highest circulation within the local area.
Where an existing pharmacy wants to relocate a poster will be displayed in the current pharmacy premises.
The advert and/or poster will let you know how you can take part in the consultation. Normally this will be by completing an electronic questionnaire which you can access through the HB’s website. The link to this questionnaire will appear clearly in the advert and/or poster.
If you do not have access to a computer, a paper version of the questionnaire will be also available. For those who need it, the questionnaire will be available in large font, Braille and other languages. Detail on how to get a paper questionnaire will appear clearly in the advert and/or poster.
General comments are also welcomed and details on how to do this will appear clearly in the advert and/or poster.
The HB also writes to the following to get a community view:
The public consultation lasts for 90 working days (does not include weekends & public holidays) and all responses received by the end of this period are included within the Consultation Analysis Report (CAR). This report details the extent of the consultation and summarises all the replies received.
The purpose of the Health Board’s Pharmaceutical Care Services Plan is to provide additional information on services currently available.
When fully developed the plan should identify if there are any localities within the Health Board where pharmacy services might need to be improved. The Board is unable to analyse current health data sufficiently to be able to make this statement currently.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was currently inadequate.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Asgher Mohammed – Unit 4, 170 High Street, Glasgow G1 1QLHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th December 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of additional pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Boots the Chemist – Dundas Street, Queen Street Station, Glasgow G1 2AFHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th April 2003
That the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Queen Street Station, Dundas Street, Glasgow, G1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Boots The Chemist – Dundas Street, Glasgow G1 2AFHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th November 2003.
That the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Queen Street Station, Dundas Street, Glasgow, G1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 3, 130 Gallowgate, Glasgow G1 5AEHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th June 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Eggle Ltd, 199 Gallowgate, Glasgow G1 5DYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th December 2012.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel remitted back to the PPC.
Re-heard by the PPC on the 31st October 2013
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Rajinder Singh, 81 St George’s Road, Glasgow G3 6JAHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 81 St George’s Road, Charing Cross, Glasgow, G3 6JA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused. The Committee noted there existed an adequate pharmaceutical service within the area, with three pharmacies located in the defined neighbourhood and fourteen within a one mile radius. The Committee noted that the pharmacies located in the defined neighbourhood offered Supervised Methadone Administration Scheme, Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy and Advice to Nursing Home services and that the overall level of service provide by pharmacies was already adequate.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Gazenfer Ali of Vitalis Healthcare Ltd, 59 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6QXHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th September 2012.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Gazenfer Ali of Vitalis Healthcare Ltd, 59 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6QXHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 3rd June 2013.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. There was room for improvement in the marketing and communication of the availability of translation services, which was being addressed, but the service was there and was being provided.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th April 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Farzana Rasool & Mr Aziz Rasool, 111 Cambridge Street, Glasgow G3 6RUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st September 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances. it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Salman Shaikh, 1066 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3 8LYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th September 2002.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 1066 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3.8 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Apple Healthcare Group, 1056 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3 8LYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1056 Argyle Street, Glasgow G3.8 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Lisa Christie – LG Pharmacy Ltd, Unit 12, 19 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Mr A Manzoor & Ms Amina Al-Adhami – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2007.
The PPC agreed to postpone consideration of the application from Mr A Manzoor and Ms Amina al-Adhami until the National Appeals Panel had made a determination on LG Pharmacy Ltd’s application.
Mr A Manzoor & Ms Amina Al-Adhami – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Lisa Christie – LG Pharmacy Ltd, Unit 12, 19 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th February 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Ian Robert Mouat – 11 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th December 2009
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Humyra Ahmed & Mr Ahmed Manzoor – 5/7 Kennedy Path, Townhead, Glasgow G4 0PPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th August 2017.
In considering the application, the Committee took account of all relevant factors concerning neighbourhood and adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located, in terms of Regulation 5(10).
It also took account of all information available to it, which was relevant to the application. For the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was adequate, given the level of service currently being provided by existing pharmacy contractors located outwith the neighbourhood. It was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to grant the application. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ms Tajinderjit K Sandhu – Unit 12, 42-46, New City Road, New City Road, Glasgow G4 9JTHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 12, 42-44 New City Road, Glasgow G4.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – Untit E, Morrison Street, Kingston Quay, Glasgow G5Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Houlihan Pharmacy Ltd – Unit 2, Block 0, 34 Elmfoot Grove, Oatlands, Glasgow G5 0LRHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th September 2019.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Ameen Mohammed & Mr Rashid Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th January 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th April 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Remitted back to board
Mr Ameen Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th November 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeal Panel Decision, remitted back to the Board.
Mr Ameen Mohammed – 460 Ballater Street, Glasgow G5 0QWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2013.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr C M Razwan Shafi – 34 Bridge Street, Glasgow G5 9HUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st February 2005.
The Committee agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary. A majority decision by the Committee members agreed that the granting of the application was highly desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 34 Bridge Street, Glasgow, G5 9HU for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – 151 Oxford Street, Glasgow G5 9JEHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th March 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Denis F Houlihan – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Patrick Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th September 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st November 2002.
That decision on the application be deferred, and an oral hearing arranged. Additionally, that further supplementary information be made available to the Committee for their next meeting.
Deferred and an oral hearing scheduled.
Mr John Gilbride – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 23rd January 2003.
It was a majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mrs Carol F Anderson – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2003.
In the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ms Suman Barhaya – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th March 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th January 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Adill Sheikh of Albert Cross Ltd – 672 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Ameen – 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th March 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mrs Carol F Anderson (T/A L B Dunn Chemist) – 590-592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000.
Deferred and an oral hearing scheduled.
Mrs Carol F Anderson (T/A L B Dunn Chemist) – 590-592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow G5 9RUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 28th November 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 590/592 Eglinton Street, Glasgow, G5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Eglinton Healthcare Ltd – 433 Eglinton Street, Glasgow, G5 9RUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th June 2022.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.22 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G11 to G20 Applications Buchanan & Campbell – Unit 5, Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 6RYNational Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th June 2000.
That the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 5 West End Retail Park, Crow Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Boots The Chemist – Unit 5, Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 6RYNational Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st June 2001.
That the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit 5 West End Retail Park, Crow Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
Boots The Chemist – 50 Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 7RYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2005.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed
Boots The Chemist – 50 Crow Road, West End Retail Park, Glasgow G11 7RYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th November 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 50 Crow Road, Glasgow G11.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 33-35 Bank Street, Glasgow G12 8NDHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th April 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 33/35 Bank Street, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
New Kirk Pharmacy Ltd – 1 Kirklee Road, Glasgow G12 0RLHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th June 2000.
That the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 1 Kirklee Road, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be not granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 156 Dorchester Avenue, Glasgow G12 0DZHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2000.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 156 Dorchester Avenue, Glasgow G12.0 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Apple Pharmacy – Level 1, Hillhead Street, The Hub Complex, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QEHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 31st March 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th April 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Avind Salwan & Mr Neeraj Salwan – 65 Hillhead Street, Level 1, Fraser Building, University Of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 14th March 2013.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicants were neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Sinclair Shops Ltd – Rotherwood Avenue, Blairdardie, Glasgow G13 2AYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 16th June 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Olayinka Ogunnoiki – 10 Yokermill Road, Glasgow G13 4PUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th June 2005.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary. or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 Yokermill Road, Glasgow G13.4 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
New Age Healthcare Ltd – 37 Glenkirk Drive, Glasgow G15 6BSHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th December 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Joyce Morrison Ltd – 8 Rozelle Avenue, Glasgow G15 7QRHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th April 2000.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 8 Rozelle Avenue, Glasgow for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Sinclair Shops Ltd – 1927 Maryhill Road, Glasgow G20 0BXHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th February 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 3a, Hopehill Road, Glasgow G20 7JNHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th May 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 351 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20 9REHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 331 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9REHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 3331 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr M Rashid – 351 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9REHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 351 Bilsland Drive, Glasgow G20.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
DS Pharm Ltd – 261 – 263 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9REHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th April 2022.
In determining this application, the PPC was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.15 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
CD Chem Limited – 261 – 263 Bilsland Drive, Ruchill, Glasgow G20 9REHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th May 2016 (Re-sit on the 28th November 2016).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 7.2 in PPC/INCL03/2016) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G21 to G40 Applications Mr Andrew McMurdo & Ms Lisa Fergusson – 1 Fountainwell Square, K.A.T.S. Building, Glasgow G21 1RBHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood was currently inadequate.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood.
No appeal received; File closed.
New Age Healthcare Ltd – 24 Quarrywood Avenue, Glasgow G21 3ESHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th January 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
T S McNee Ltd – 227 Wallacewell Road, Glasgow G21 3PRHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2001.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 227 Wallacewell Road, Glasgow G21.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Tesco Stores Ltd – Codben Road, St Rollox Business Park, Glasgow G21 4Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th January 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Tesco Stores Ltd, St Rollox Business Park, Cobden Road, Glasgow G21.1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ann & Colin Fergusson – 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21 4ALHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th February 2006.
That determination of C&A Fergusson’s application be deferred until the April meeting or until such times as the Committee had received and had the opportunity to consider guidance from Central Legal Office in relation to this issue.
Deferred, and an oral hearing to be arranged.
Ann & Colin Fergusson – 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21 4ALHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the Contractor Services adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 194 Petershill Road, Glasgow G21.4 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th October 2005.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
T S McNee Ltd – 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22 6BDHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 15th February 2001.
That consideration of the application be deferred until clarification is sought regarding the leasing of the premises.
Mr Mohammed Rashid – 641 Hawthorn Street, Glasgow G22 6AZHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
T S McNee Ltd – 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22 6BDHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2001.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 194 Fernbank Street, Glasgow G22.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Vishal Sood – 701 – 703 Balmore Road, Glasgow G22 6QTHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th August 2016.
In considering this application, the Committee was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 7.6 of PPC/INCL05/2016) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 52 Skirsa Street, Glasgow G23 5BAHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 52 Skirsa Street, Glasgow G23.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 43, The Forge Parkhead, Parkhead, Glasgow G31 4EBHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 10th October 2014.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mrs Carol Ann Burns – 1399 London Road, Glasgow G31 4PFHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on 10th June 2010
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mohammed Yousaf Ahmad – 328 Westmuir Street, Glasgow G31 5BYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Elizabeth Blair & Ms Angela Mackie – 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd August 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the proposed premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood; it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Ms Angela Mackie, 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Ms Angela Mackie – 3 Budhill Avenue, Springboig, Glasgow G32 0PWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 3rd November 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
L Rowland & Co (Retail) Ltd – 275 Carntyne Road, Glasgow G32 6JPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 275 Carntyne Road, Glasgow G32.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
National Co-Operative Chemists Ltd – 1158 Shettleston Road, Glasgow G32 7PQHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
That the granting of the application was necessary to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking a relocation in the Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1158 Shettleston Road, Glasgow, G32 7PQ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Rightdose Healthcare Ltd – 390 Ardgay Street, Sandyhills, Glasgow, G32 9EEHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th February 2022.
In determining this application, the PPC was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.15 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Invercoast Ltd – 18 Grantlea Terrace, Sandymount Post Office, Mount Vernon, Glasgow G32 9JNHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at Sandymount Post Office, 18 Grantlea Terrace, Mount Vernon, Glasgow G32.9 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 125 Robroyston Road, Glasgow G33 1HTHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th October 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
The Committee unanimously agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Lamlash Cres, Glasgow, G33 3LH for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr David Liston – 6 Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 6b Lamlash Crescent, Cranhill, Glasgow G33 3LQHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th November 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Wellhouse Healthcare Ltd – 23 Newhills Road, Easterhouse, Glasgow G33 4HHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th October 2017.
In considering the application, the Committee took account of all relevant factors concerning neighbourhood and adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located, in terms of Regulation 5(10).
It also took account of all information available to it, which was relevant to the application. For the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services to the neighbourhood was adequate, given the level of service currently being provided by existing pharmacy contractors located outwith the neighbourhood. It was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to grant the application. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Wellhouse Healthcare Ltd – 23 Newhills Road, Easterhouse, Glasgow G33 4HHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd March 2020.
In considering this application, the Committee was required to take into account all relevant factors concerning the definition of the neighbourhood served and the adequacy of existing pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in the context of Regulation 5(10).
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out in the minute, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was adequate and, therefore, it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the Application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Mark Godden, Baxter Healthcare Ltd – 2a Burntboom Court, Shotts Street, Queenslie Ind Est, Clinovia, Glasgow G33 4JB
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at Clinovia Ltd, 2A Burntbroom Court, Shotts Street, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4JB for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted to provide services outwith those specified in the Model Hours of Service Scheme.
No appeal received; File closed.
Boots The Chemist – Units 21 -23 Auchinlea Road, The Fort Retail Park, Glasgow G33 5ATHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
Unanimously that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at Units 21-23 Glasgow Fort Retail Park, Auchinlea Road, Glasgow, G33 5AT for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 14 Barholm Square, Garthamlock, Glasgow G33 5EE.Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 14 Barholm Square, Glasgow, G33 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 11 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow G33 5NZHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th November 2003.
That the granting of the application was necessary and desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 11 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow, G33 5NZ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 9 Mossvale Crescent, Craigend, Glasgow G33 5NZHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 9 Mossvale Crescent, Garthamlock, Glasgow, G33 5NZ for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused as a pharmaceutical contract had been granted in November 2003 and was being currently held on the Board’s Provisional List for premises situated at 11 Mossvale Crescent.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Assura Pharmacy Ltd – 63 Cumbernauld Road, Somerfield Supermarkets, Stepps, Glasgow G33 6NBHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises occupied by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List were adequate and therefore the application by the Applicant to open an additional pharmacy was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood. In these circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – Unit B6/7, The Glasgow Fort Development, Junction 10, Glasgow G34 9DL
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd January 2004.
That the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at Unit B 6-7 The Glasgow Fort Development, Junction 10, Glasgow, G34. for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Wm Morrison Supermarkets PLC – 20 Auchinlea Way, Glasgow G34 9JJHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 20 Auchinlea Road, Glasgow G33.9
No appeal received; File closed.
P B Devlin Ltd – 2 Main Street, Glasgow G40 2LAHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was not necessary but was desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 2 Bain Street, Glasgow, G40 2LA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted, with the proviso that the applicant increase the opening hours to comply with the Model Hours Scheme, which are defined as 9.00am to 5.30pm, Monday to Saturday, with the flexibility to allow up to 2 half days per week, one week day and a Saturday afternoon, from 1.00pm.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
G41 to G60 Applications Mr Mohammed Khalik Jamil & Mrs Farhat Jamil – 219-221, St Andrew’s Road Glasgow G41 1PDHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th August 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Iain McDowall – 15 Barrland Street, Eglinton, Glasgow G41 1QHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th May 2016.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, the Committee was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at 15 Barrland Street, Glasgow, G41 1QH was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and, in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Committee that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mrs Carol Anderson – Unit 1 or 2, Pollokshaws Road, Glasgow G41 2Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
The Committee deferred this application for inclusion in the pharmaceutical list on the basis that Mr John Gilbride had appealed against the PPC’s decision of 23 January 2003 not to grant a pharmaceutical contract at 668 Eglinton Street, Glasgow. The Committee therefore decided to defer Mrs Anderson’s application until the National Appeal Panel had decided on Mr Gilbride’s case.
No appeal received; File closed.
M A Sheikh Properties Ltd – 455 Victoria Road, Glasgow G42 8RWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th November 2011.
Having regard to the overall services provided by the existing contractors within the vicinity of the proposed pharmacy, the number of prescriptions dispensed by those contractors in the preceding 12 months, and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, the committee agreed that the neighbourhood was currently adequately served. The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List. In the circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 11 Fieldhead Square, Glasgow G43 1HLHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a majority decision (three votes to one) the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 11 Fieldhead Square, Auldhouse, Glasgow, G43 1HL for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted. The Committee felt that the granting of this contract was desirable, though not necessary as no other pharmacies exist within the defined neighbourhood. The Committee also felt that the granting of this contract would not have a detrimental effect on the other pharmaceutical contractors in the area.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mrs Elizabeth Roddick – 10 MacLaren Place, Glasgow G44 3RZHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th September 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 MacLaren Place, Glasgow G44.3 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Pri-Tam Health Care Ltd – 606-608 Boydstone Road, Thornliebank G46 8NFHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th June 2005.
In summary, the Committee concluded that the granting of an additional NHS contract for the premises to be situated at 606-608 Boydestone Road, Carnwadric, Glasgow G46.8, was not necessary or desirable in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were situated.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Jim Rae – 3 Kennishead Road, Thornliebank G46 8NYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th March 2003.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 3 Kennishead Road, Thornliebank, Glasgow, G46 8NY for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Kasim Gulzar – 1-3 Kennishead Avenue, Thornliebank G46 8PRHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th March 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Mohammad Y Ahmad – Unit 4, Shieldhall Retail Park, Glasgow G51 4DJHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 29th April 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Masood Ulhaq – 1195 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4PWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th March 2020.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 12.1 – 12.10 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Masood Ulhaq & Ms Aisha Ihsan – 1195, Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4PWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th March 2020.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Tejinder Bhopal – 50 Lyoncross Road, Glasgow G53 5UWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 22nd November 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Dr Saduf Riaz of Premichem Pharmacy Ltd – 343 Nitshill Road, Glasgow G53 7BLHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th January 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Farhat & Ramzan Ali – 1371 Barrhead Road, Crookston, Glasgow G53 7DAHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th January 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Advance Pharmacies Ltd – 26/28 Willowford Road, Darnley, Glasgow G53 7LPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 9th September 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Houlihan Pharmacy Ltd – 9-11 Darnley Mains Road, Glasgow G53 7RHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 8th August 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 911 Darnley Mains Road, Glasgow G53.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd – Darnley Mains Road, Darnley, Glasgow G53 7RHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th January 2002.
That the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 205 Hamilton Road, Glasgow G72.7 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Sycamore Mill LLP – 500 Corselet Road, Old Darnley Mill, Darnley, Glasgow G53 7RNHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th April 2023.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out within the minute, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.19 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to had an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeal Panel remitted back to the PPC on 17th May 2024.
Re-heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th July 2024.
No appeal received; File closed.
G61 to G83 Applications Mr Neeraj Salwan – 7-9 Rannoch Drive, Glasgow G61Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2005.
By unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 7/9 Rannoch Drive Glasgow G61.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 2b Monreith Avenue, Glasgow G61.1 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
Following the National Appeal Panel Decision, the decision was deferred back to the PPC.
Apple Healthcare Group Ltd – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th December 2006.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical service in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
Following a 2nd National Appeal Panel Decision, the decision was deferred back to the PPC.
Apple Healthcare Group – 2b Monreith Avenue, Bearsden G61 1NJHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 24th May 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 165 Milngavie Road, Glassow G61 3DYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st September 2000.
The PPC decided that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises, and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care Trust’s Pharmaceutical List at 165 Milngavie Road, Glasgow G61.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
No appeal received; File closed
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 1b, Strathkelvin Retail Park, Bishopbriggs G64 2TSPharmacy Practices Committee meeting cancelled on the 23rd August 2010.
Boots UK Ltd – Unit 1b, Strathkelvin Retail Park, Bishopbriggs G64 2TSHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th October 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Sanjay Majuh – Unit F, Lomond Drive, Bishopbriggs G64 3BYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th November 2010.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Brendan J Semple & Mr James B Semple – 63-65 Main Street, Torrance, G64 4ELHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st February 2005.
The Committee unanimously agreed that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 63-65 Main Street, Torrance, G64 4EL, for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – Unit 1az, St John’s Way, Main Street, Twechar G65 9TAHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was necessary, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at Twechar Healthy Living & Enterprise Centre, Unit 1AZ, St John’s Way, Main Street, Twechar, Glasgow G65.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr N Ahmad – 10 Newdyke Road, Kirkintilloch G66 2PXHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th April 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was necessary and desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 10 Newdyke Road, Glasgow G66.2 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Aidan Connolly – Gleneden Court, Kirkintilloch Road, Lenzie, Glasgow G66 4LQHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th January 2023.
The Committee concluded that there was no evidence provided to demonstrate any inadequacy of the existing pharmaceutical services to the defined neighbourhood.
In accordance with the procedure on applications contained within Paragraph 6, Schedule 4 of the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009, as amended, the Committee, for the reasons set out in the attached document, considered that the pharmaceutical service into the neighbourhood to be adequate.
Accordingly, the decision of the Committee was unanimous that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises was neither necessary nor desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the pharmaceutical list, and accordingly the application was rejected. This decision was made subject to the right of appeal as specified in Paragraph 4.1, Regulations 2009, as amended.
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 17th February 2011.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Ross Hugh Ferguson – 6 Campsie Road, Milton of Campsie G66 8EAHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
That the granting of the application was necessary to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Primary Care NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 6 Campsie Road, Milton of Campsie, Glasgow, G66 8EA for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Neeraj Salwan – 2 Old Gartloch Road, Gartcosh G69 8EUHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th September 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Razwan Shafi – 17 Busby Road, Glasgow G76 9BPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th November 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
No appeal received; File closed.
NSJ Ltd, T/A Mearnskirk Pharmacy – 421 Mearns Road, Mearnskirk, Newton Mearns G77 5RYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st September 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 13 – 13.18 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Denis Houlihan – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th October 2009.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
Rowlands Pharmacy – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NPAddress: Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NP
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st April 2011.
The PPC were satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it were the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Rowland, L & Co (Retail) Ltd – Unit 2, Greenlaw Village, Newton Mearns, G77 6NPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 23rd October 2012.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the Greenlaw Village premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the Pharmaceutical List and in these circumstances it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
No appeal received; File closed.
Woodneuk Healthcare Ltd – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead G78 1EPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 6th March 2008
The Committee requested that an oral hearing of the application be arranged.
Woodneuk Healthcare Ltd – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead, G78 1EPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mr Tom McInally – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead, G78 1EYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 2nd March 2007.
The Pharmacy Practices Committee suspended this meeting.
Mr Tom McInally – 196 Cross Arthurlie Street, Barrhead, G78 1EYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 4th July 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Messrs Devanney & McFarlane – 30 Alexandra Street, Glasgow G81Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st March 2002.
It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 5, 485-507 Glasgow Road, Clydebank G81 1JPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th October 2008
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. Reheard by the PPC on the 27th July 2009.
Lloydspharmacy Ltd – Unit 5, 485-507 Glasgow Road, Clydebank G81 1JPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27th July 2009
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher G81 1UGHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 1st June 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was desirable, though not necessary, to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher, West Dunbartonshire, G81 1UG for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted as the pharmacy would serve the area of Duntocher and would not have a detrimental effect on the pharmacy located at Hardgate Cross in Clydebank. They also considered that the application be desirable as there were no other pharmacies located within the defined neighbourhood and the pharmacy users would find the new pharmacy easily accessible without the barrier of the busy road and junction located at Hardgate Cross.
National Appeals Panel overturned the PPC decision. File closed.
M & D Green Dispensing Chemists – 80 Dumbarton Road, Duntocher G81 1UGHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th December 2004.
The Committee noted that this application had been withdrawn prior to the meeting. File closed.
BGR Healthcare Ltd – 258b Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 26th September 2019.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 12.8 above) and the level of service provided by those contractors to the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
BGR Healthcare Ltd – 258b Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th June 2017.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraph 12.8) and the level of service provided by the contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Healthcare Group – 258 Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 13th June 2006.
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was not necessary or desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde’s Pharmaceutical List at 258 Faifley Road, Faifley, Glasgow G81.5 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Faisal Khan & Yassir Shaheen – 290 Faifley Road, Faifley G81 5EYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th October 2004.
In a unanimous decision, the Committee agreed that the granting of the application was neither necessary or desirable to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 290 Faifley Road, Faifley, G81 5EY for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Ms Angela Mackie – 290 Faifley Road, Glasgow G81 5EYHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 5th May 2011
The PPC were satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant were not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it were the majority decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Invercoast Ltd – 1 Duntiglennan Road, Duntocher G81 6HFHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 18th August 2005
The Committee agreed by unanimous decision that the granting of the application was desirable, in order to secure the adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood of the proposed premises and accordingly that the application seeking inclusion in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board’s Pharmaceutical List at 1 Duntiglennan Road, Glasgow G81.6 for the provision of general pharmaceutical services be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Assura Pharmacy Ltd – 32a Brucehill Road, Dumbarton G82 4ENHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st November 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be granted.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Invercoast Ltd – 32a Brucehill Road, Dumbarton G82 4EWHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the***.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was necessary and desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood. I., It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be approved.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Apple Pharmacy – 10 Hillview Place, Glasgow G83 0QDHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th April 2008.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Sohail Healthcare (Scotland) Ltd – 8 Hillview Place, Alexandria G83 0QDHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 12th April 2016.
The committee was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Mitchell and Pollock Ltd – 19 Brown Street, Balloch, Alexandria G83 8HJHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 21st July 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was adequate and, therefore, it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the Application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
PA1 to PA15 Applications Brogan Healthcare Limited – 4 Blackford Road, Paisley PA2 7ENAddress: 4 Blackford Road, Pailsey PA2 7EN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 19th March 2018.
Taking into account all of the information available, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 17.4-17.8 in PPC/INCL01/2018) and the level of service provided by the contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy. It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
TC Trading (Scotland) Ltd – 4 Blackford Road, Paisley PA2 7EPHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 11th September 2023
The Committee considered whether granting this Application was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in and to the Neighbourhood. The Committee agreed that it was necessary and desirable to grant the Application in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services within the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names were included in the pharmaceutical list, and accordingly the Application was granted. This decision was made subject to the right of appeal as specified in Paragraph 4.1, Regulations 2009, as amended.
National Appeal Panel remitted back to the PPC on 12th June 2024.
Re-heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 20th June 2024.
Logan Gray Ltd – 23 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JN23 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JN
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 27TH October 2021.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the PPC that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined by it in Paragraphs 10- 10.19 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and it was neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy.
It was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
No appeal received; File closed.
Mr Andrew Mooney – 19 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JW19 Greenock Road, Bishopton PA7 5JW
Heard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 30th March 2016.
The Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at Unit 3, 19 Greenock Road, Bishopton, PA7 5JW was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List and in the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the Pharmacy Practices Committee (PPC) that the application be refused.
National Appeals Panel upheld the PPC decision. File closed.
Dears Pharmacy – 37 Church Street, Port Glasgow PA14 5EHHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the ***.
PA14 5EH – Dears Pharmacy, 37 Church Street, Port Glasgow
Last submission date for application was 24th July 2017, No application received; therefore file was closed.
Mr Edward McAnerney – 26 Corlic Street, Greenock PA15 3LJHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 7th February 2020.
Taking into account all of the information available, and for the reasons set out above, it was the view of the Committee that the provision of pharmaceutical services in or to the neighbourhood (as defined in Paragraphs 10.7-10.11 above) and the level of service provided by the existing contractors in the neighbourhood, was currently adequate and that it was therefore neither necessary nor desirable to have an additional pharmacy at the proposed premises. It was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received, File closed.
Arvinder Bilion & James Innes – 14 Barscube Terrace, Paisley PA2 6XAHeard by the Pharmacy Practices Committee on the 14th December 2007.
The PPC was satisfied that the provision of pharmaceutical services at the premises of the Applicant was not necessary or desirable in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood in which the premises were located by persons whose names are included in the Pharmaceutical List. In the circumstances, it was the unanimous decision of the PPC that the application be refused.
No appeal received, File closed.
If you are interested in opening a new pharmacy in the community, please familiarise yourself with the current Regulations and associated documents using the links below.
If you require further information on the processes involved, please contact the Community Pharmacy Development Team at cpdt@ggc.scot.nhs.uk, or call Monday to Friday, 9.00am to 5.00pm 0141 201 6041 / 0141 201 6054.